Can all voices be heard? Active learning strategies enhance FSL oral production

  • Sophia Bello University of Toronto

Résumé

One of the challenges we face when teaching a language course is how to promote and increase students’ active participation. The instructor does the majority of the talking, and in doing so, neglects to provide enough opportunity for a student’s voice to be heard. This paper considers active learning as the best approach to teaching a second language. The instructor is essentially a learner, not a teacher. In a weekly tutorial section of an advanced FSL course, a group of students must design, present, and deliver a student-run reading workshop. This includes an assigned reading on a specific theme and a PowerPoint presentation. Various activities are used to enhance oral production, three of which are discussed: an online-based activity using Kahoot!, a debate on maternity leave benefits, and team-building through story-telling. Despite a few setbacks, active learning motivates students to take charge and personally contribute to their language learning. 

Références

Bonwell, Charles C. and James A. Eison. Active Learning Creating Excitement in the Classroom (ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Rep. No. 1). George Washington University, 1991.

Chickering, Arthur W. and Zelda F. Gamson. “Seven Principles for Good Practice in Undergraduate Education.” American Association of Higher Education Bulletin, vol. 39, no. 7, 1987, pp. 3-7.

Cross, Patricia. “Teaching for Learning.” American Association of Higher Education Bulletin, vol. 39, no. 8, 1987, pp. 3-7.

Felder, Richard M. and Rebecca Brent. “Active Learning: An Introduction.” ASQ Higher Education Brief, vol. 2, no. 4, 2009, pp. 1-5.

Girardet, Jacky and Jacques Pêcheur. Echo B1.2 – 2e Ed.: Méthode de Français. 2e ed., CLE International, 2013.

“Inclusive Design.” ICT –Kahoot!, Design and Architecture Norway, 2010,
www.inclusivedesign.no/ict/kahoot-article172-261.html?redirect=invalidurl.

Kohonen, Viljo. “Learning to Learn Through Reflection – An Experiential Learning Perspective.” Preparing Teachers to Use the European Language Portfolio – Arguments, Materials and Resources, Council of Europe Publishing, 2007.

Lyman, Frank. “The Responsive Classroom Discussion: The Inclusion of All Students.” Mainstreaming Digest, edited by Audrey S. Anderson, University of Maryland Press, 1981, pp. 109-113.

Magloff, Lisa. “The Benefits of Team Building.” Demand Media, Hearst Newspapers, 2016, smallbusiness.chron.com/benefits-team-building-1979.html.

"Making Learning Awesome!" Kahoot!, Kahoot! AS, 3 Sept. 2013, getkahoot.com.

Michel, Norbert, et al. “Active Versus Passive Teaching Styles: An Empirical Study of Student Learning Outcomes.” Small Business Institute National Proceedings, vol. 33, no. 1, 2009, pp. 55-.67.

Paxman, Jenny R., et al. “Motivation, Confidence, and Control; Unraveling Active Learning for Nutrition and Food Undergraduates.” Journal of Food Science Education, vol. 10, 2011, pp. 45-53.

Rear, David. “Critical Thinking, Language and Problem-Solving: Scaffolding Thinking Skills through Debate.” Essential Competencies for English-medium University Teaching, edited by Ruth Breeze and Carmen Sancho Guinda, Springer International Publishing, 2017, pp. 51-63.

Schor, Dario, et al. “Complementing Classroom Experience with Student-Run Workshops.” Proceedings of the Canadian Engineering Education Association, CEEA
Publiée
2018-02-04